Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 18564 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2005 15:35:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Sep 2005 15:35:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 77115 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2005 15:35:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 77063 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2005 15:35:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 77050 invoked by uid 99); 4 Sep 2005 15:35:45 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:35:45 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [66.163.169.223] (HELO smtp104.mail.sc5.yahoo.com) (66.163.169.223) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:36:00 -0700 Received: (qmail 80669 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2005 15:35:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.2?) (spalias78@71.65.234.198 with plain) by smtp104.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Sep 2005 15:35:43 -0000 Message-ID: <431B144B.6010301@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 11:35:39 -0400 From: Sachin Patel User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0+ (Windows/20050712) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Are these files ok? References: <431A5364.9060904@savoirtech.com> <431A56ED.4000801@gmail.com> <431B01FF.60100@savoirtech.com> <431B09F1.5040704@savoirtech.com> In-Reply-To: <431B09F1.5040704@savoirtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Could we just prevent that by overriding the maven:eclipse goal in the projects' maven.xml and echo out a message stating a message that no .classpath generation is necessary since these are already eclipse projects? FYI. The mevenide plugin is also including the .classpath in their repo. Sachin. Jeff Genender wrote: > Hmmm now that I think about this... > > Sachin, these files will likely get overwritten when someone does a > "maven eclipse". Be prepared for these to get overwritten fairly > often, and will likely get rechecked in. > > Jeff > > Jeff Genender wrote: >> >> >> Sachin Patel wrote: >> >>> Yes, I think this is needed. Since these are eclipse plugins to >>> begin with I consider these to be part of the project >>> configuration. Eclipse users should be able to directly import >>> these projects into Eclipse without having to generate the .classpath. >> >> >> As long as these have no machine specific info in it then it may be >> ok. ..ie same configuration that will work on Windows, Linux, and >> Mac. But normally, I am against this. We usually use maven to >> generate these files for us. >> >> Jeff >> >> >>> >>> Jeff Genender wrote: >>> >>>> I noticed these files going into the eclipse plugin: >>>> >>>> UU sandbox/eclipse-plugin/org.apache.geronimo.ui/.classpath >>>> UU >>>> sandbox/eclipse-plugin/org.apache.geronimo.deployment.model/.classpath >>>> UU sandbox/eclipse-plugin/org.apache.geronimo.core/.classpath >>>> >>>> >>>> Are these ok? IIRC, these are user/computer specific to the user's >>>> setup. Are these supposed to be checked in (.classpath)?? >>>> >>>> Jeff >>>> >