geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Blevins <david.blev...@visi.com>
Subject Re: [discuss] branch and tag policy (and stable/unstable mixed in :)
Date Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:23:04 GMT

On Sep 20, 2005, at 10:29 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
> Anyway, there's one other thing to think about - When do we want to  
> make a release that we are willing to support?
>

Been trying to get that conversation going.  What are you're thoughts?

On Sep 19, 2005, at 9:50 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Are we going to put a stake in the sand now and start doing minor  
> revisions (patch only, no new features) on this release... or are  
> we going to wait till some time in the future?
>
> I am totally cool with whatever, but we have to get on the same  
> page first.
>
> If we decide to put a stake in the sand now and branch off a  
> stabilization effort, we will need to define at least at a high  
> level what "stable" means to us in terms of the actual code,  
> functionality, and files that comprise our software.  There must be  
> some common yardstick on which we measure stable/unstable.

On Sep 20, 2005, at 12:03 AM, David Blevins wrote:
> [...] we still need to decide what page we are on in terms of if  
> now is the time to put a stake in the sand.  Obviously the process  
> for a "tag" and a "branch" is not the same.
>
> So where are we at?  Are we branching for stability now or tagging  
> our way to a codebase we are willing to maintain as stable?




Mime
View raw message