geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Blevins <david.blev...@visi.com>
Subject Re: [discuss] branch and tag policy (and stable/unstable mixed in :)
Date Tue, 20 Sep 2005 00:45:57 GMT
+1

As I've said during M4, "Alright, IMHO, we've outgrown milestones"

See "Thinking beyond 1.0", http://www.mail-archive.com/ 
dev@geronimo.apache.org/msg06953.html

Let's do this!

-David

On Sep 19, 2005, at 5:14 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:

> Before we discuss this to death, I propose:
>
> * we drop the M5 branch altogether
> * we fix any CTS regressions (once rather than twice)
>   this also gives Aaron a couple more days to finish up his features
> * we create a 1.0 branch
> * we make sure it still passes CTS, then tag it and release as 1.0.0
>
> That way we :
> * get rid of the Mx nomenclature that Geir positively dislikes
>   and that no-one else really seems to care for
> * we don't have any confusion with 1.0-M5.42 branches
> * we get onto a major.minor.maint scheme that everyone understands
>
> and most of all, we actually get 1.0.0 out as the first certified  
> release like we intended at the start of the project.
>
> --
> Jeremy
>
>


Mime
View raw message