geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Hogstrom <m...@hogstrom.org>
Subject Re: Logo contest question
Date Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:46:53 GMT
+1 :)

Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> This was an action item for me to get started, but here we go. :)
> 
> There are a few things I think we need to do.
> 
> First, we should get input from the Apache Public Relations Committee  
> as to what guidelines they are enforcing for logos, if they have any.
> 
> Then I believe that we should
> 
> 1) Have a deadline for any logo candidates (like a week...)
> 
> 2) Based on the guidelines, winnow out any contributions that we  
> wouldn't accept.  I think anything is fair game as long as it would  be 
> in line with what the ASF allows.
> 
> 3) Hold a vote on our logo - again, for a period of a week...
> 
> geir
> 
> 
> On Sep 21, 2005, at 1:39 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
> 
>> I am not sure about those votes...
>>
>> We probably need to clean out the voting and start it on an  official 
>> week,
>> etc.
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>>
>>> What is the current state of the logo contest?  Seems like its  been 
>>> open
>>> for a long time and I didn't see anything on the Wiki that  indicated an
>>> end date.  The reason I'm asking is that I need to replace some of  the
>>> GIFs in DayTrader that were formerly the IBM logos and images with  some
>>> new and cooler ones.  One thing I'd like to do is ask for  contributions
>>> but it doesn't seem appropriate if e haven't figured out the contest
>>> that we have open already.
>>>
>>> If we need someone to lead the voting and process to bring that to
>>> conclusion I volunteer to lead it with the PMC's permission so I  can 
>>> get
>>> some other artwork in the pipeline.
>>>
>>> The current results as of today are:
>>>
>>> Number 6 is clearly out in the lead.  I'm not sure hot the contest  was
>>> structured but it looks like people have been voting has been  going on
>>> all along but new entries have been coming in too so the folks who  were
>>> late to the party may have been a better choice had they been on the
>>> list previously.  I assume that the PMC will be taking that into  
>>> account.
>>>
>>> Votes    Entry
>>> 0    #18
>>> 2    #17
>>> 0    #16
>>> 0    #15
>>> 0    #14
>>> 0    #13
>>> 0    #12
>>> 18    #11
>>> 0    #10
>>> 1    #9
>>> 1    #8
>>> 2    #7
>>> 39    #6
>>> 0    #5
>>> 2    #4
>>> 4    #3
>>> 28    #2
>>> 1    #1
>>>
>>> Is there an end date in mind for this activity?
>>>
>>> thoughts?
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 


Mime
View raw message