+1 Accept the DayTrader donation into the project
-1 Do not create Applications subproject. Leave in trunk.
(Keep it simple for now. Review this later when Geronimo is more
stable. I think it is too early to try to have applications with their
own release cycle).
John
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> There has been little comment or complaint about the "DayTrader"
> contribution GERONIMO-1016.
>
> I have done a cursory review and committed the code minus the binary
> code (.class and .ear) into trunk/sandbox. I did this as a courtesy to
> Matt so he can keep working and submitting patches for now. (Matt, get
> rid of the App.java stuff that seem to be maven detritus..)
>
> For efficiency, I'd like to vote on two things.
>
> First, whether or not to accept. All votes welcome, PMC votes binding :
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the DayTrader donation into the project
> [ ] -1 Do not accept DayTrader donation into the project
>
>
> Second, we now have a collection of samples, applications and such. I
> think that it would help keep the trunk clear if we started an
> Applications subproject (peer with DevTools) and move everything like
> it there.
>
> [ ] +1 Create an Applications subproject (to which Apache Geronimo
> subproject rules apply) and move DayTrader (if accepted)
> with other relevant codebases into it
> [ ] -1 Do not create Applications subproject. Leave in trunk.
>
>
> I'm happy for people to pose alternatives if there are good ones - I
> just didn't see any on the threads so far.
>
> geir
>
|