geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeremy Boynes <>
Subject Re: [discuss] branch and tag policy (and stable/unstable mixed in :)
Date Tue, 20 Sep 2005 00:14:06 GMT
Before we discuss this to death, I propose:

* we drop the M5 branch altogether
* we fix any CTS regressions (once rather than twice)
   this also gives Aaron a couple more days to finish up his features
* we create a 1.0 branch
* we make sure it still passes CTS, then tag it and release as 1.0.0

That way we :
* get rid of the Mx nomenclature that Geir positively dislikes
   and that no-one else really seems to care for
* we don't have any confusion with 1.0-M5.42 branches
* we get onto a major.minor.maint scheme that everyone understands

and most of all, we actually get 1.0.0 out as the first certified 
release like we intended at the start of the project.


View raw message