geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <>
Subject Re: M5 - 24hr notice of branch - done
Date Mon, 19 Sep 2005 15:27:39 GMT
On 9/19/2005 8:23 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:

> On 9/19/05, *Alan D. Cabrera* < 
> <>> wrote:
>     Agreed, bug fixes we do put into both branches.  However, Aaron is
>     talking about features, IIUC.
>     Just to be succinct, my -1 is a real technical veto on adding
>     features,
>     not bug fixes, to both branches; though I am not intransigent and am
>     willing to discuss it further.
> I'm not sure how you came to that conclusion, since I don't think I 
> really said what I was talking about.  But here's an example:
>  - Adding the management API for server logs.  Without this, the 
> console screen breaks if the Jetty GBean name is changed, and Tomcat 
> does not work.
> Now this is kind of a new feature, but kind of a bug fix too.  I'd be 
> inclined to put it in, since I think we'd like Tomcat to be fairly 
> well supported, and the current code is arguably broken.
> Some of the other JIRA's on my M5 list are:
>  - make the server require an argument if you want to give a list of 
> Configurations to start on the command line
>  - make the deployer require an argument if you want it to run in 
> offline mode
>  - invalid references in deployment plan should give meaningful error 
> message to deployer
>  - breakage if more than one configuration manager found
>  - installer needs to be updated to reflect current product 
> configuration options

This is a lot of work to add to two branches.  Maybe we cut the branch 
too early.


View raw message