geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Hogstrom <m...@hogstrom.org>
Subject Re: [devtools] created subproject in svn, applied outstanding patches to sandbox, and copied code into subproject
Date Thu, 08 Sep 2005 17:33:05 GMT
I'd agree with devtools...there could be a variety of others and the 
grouping makes sense.

- Matt

Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> 
> On Sep 6, 2005, at 5:29 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:
> 
>> Yes we could change the project names to distinguish.  Since all  the 
>> eclipse plugins start with org.eclipse.*, should we avoid using  
>> another organization name in the title?, what about....
>>
>> org.apache.geronimo.tools.core?
>>
>> If having both eclipse and apache in the plugin name isn't a  problem 
>> then we can go with eclipse.
> 
> 
> There's no problems in using eclipse in the namespace as well as  apache...
> 
>>
>> Or another idea would be to change the artifact's groupID to from  
>> "geronimo" to "geronimo-devtools" same as the subproject name so  that 
>> they are distinusished in the repo.
> 
> 
> yes, we should certainly do that or actually help keep good practice...
> 
> org.apache.geronimo.devtools
> 
> 
>>
>> Sachin
>>
>> Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>>
>>> Sachin Patel wrote:
>>>
>>>> Rather then throwing everything in the "eclipse-plugin" folder  
>>>> could we organize the contents down into the following structure?
>>>>
>>>> A .../trunk/modules/eclipse/plugins/ folder that contains the  
>>>> following projects...
>>>>
>>>> org.apache.geronimo.core
>>>> org.apache.geronimo.ui
>>>> org.apache.geronimo.deployment.model
>>>> org.apache.geronimo.runtime.v1
>>>>
>>>> A .../trunk/modules/eclipse/features/  folder that contains the  
>>>> following projects...
>>>>
>>>> org.apache.geronimo.feature
>>>>
>>>> Then the .../trunk/modules/eclipse/ folder itself would contain  
>>>> everything else like the top level maven.xml, the "assembly"  
>>>> project I'm about to submit, a project containing parent POM's,  etc...
>>>>
>>>> What do you think?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Do we need to avoid confusion with other Geronimo modules (e.g.  
>>> "core")?
>>>
>>> Would
>>> org.apache.geronimo.eclipse.feature
>>> org.apache.geronimo.eclipse.core
>>>
>>> be less confusing?
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Jeremy
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 



Mime
View raw message