geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@apache.org>
Subject Monday Checkpoint re M5 Cut (Was Re: [VOTE]Re: M5 Cut proposal date)
Date Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:03:15 GMT
So, where do we think we are today?

geir

On Sep 9, 2005, at 2:39 AM, David Jencks wrote:

> I think we've made significant progress in the last week towards  
> being ready to make the branch for M5, but I think there may be  
> reasons to wait a couple more days.  There are 2 features that  
> people want to get in (security improvements and DDL generation)  
> that I would like to see in M5, and more stabilization is needed in  
> any case before the release.  I think that unless someone is  
> waiting to get a new feature in that shouldn't go in M5 we should  
> wait until monday and see where we are.
>
> If anyone is contemplating a commit that may destabilize our code  
> please speak up so we can branch beforehand.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Sep 6, 2005, at 9:33 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
>
>
>> Ok ...I am hijacking this thread... enough discussion...lets vote  
>> on it...
>>
>> [ ] Friday 9/9 is the QA Cut date
>> [ ] I think it should be after Friday...and should be on ______
>>
>>
>> For me:
>> [X] Friday 9/9 is the QA Cut date
>>
>>
>> David Blevins wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 6, 2005, at 6:50 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Aaron Mulder wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>     What is the point of the "frozen list"?  At this point, it   
>>>>> doesn't appear to have stopped development of things that  
>>>>> aren't  on the list.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The list for what we are agreeing to go into M5.  If something   
>>>> isn't on the list and its an added bonus, then fine.  We need a   
>>>> closure date at this point.  I think we have all agreed what is   
>>>> minimally in the cut.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>     Maybe we should make the branch like Friday, so any code  
>>>>> not on
>>>>> the list has to go into HEAD, and just have a longer closing   
>>>>> period to
>>>>> resolve the list items.  There is a lot on the list, so that  
>>>>> would  mean a
>>>>> lot of merges to HEAD, but unless everyone is willing to hold  
>>>>> off on
>>>>> non-list items, I'm not sure we're actually moving toward  
>>>>> greater  stability in the mean time.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ok..shall we branch on Friday?  Anhyone have any issues with  
>>>> this?   I am game.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Friday is great.  Aaron expressed the same concern I was  
>>> thinking  about; getting further and further from stable the long  
>>> we wait to  branch.  Things always tend to creep in.
>>> +1
>>> David
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org



Mime
View raw message