geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Jencks (JIRA)" <...@geronimo.apache.org>
Subject [jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-925) separate security gbeans into a separate plan
Date Tue, 06 Sep 2005 18:41:30 GMT
     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-925?page=all ]
     
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-925:
---------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

done, rev 278940

> separate security gbeans into a separate plan
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: GERONIMO-925
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-925
>      Project: Geronimo
>         Type: Bug
>   Components: security
>     Versions: 1.0-M5
>     Reporter: David Jencks
>     Assignee: David Jencks
>      Fix For: 1.0-M5

>
> If you need to use a nonstandard (non-geronimo) security policy implementation, currently
you have to change the j2ee-server-plan to include the policy class or the SecurityService
gbean will fail on startup.  You can work around this by including another SecurityService
gbean in a plan that does include the policy class, but it seems a cleaner solution is to
put the security gbeans in a separate plan that can be replaced when you need a different
policy.  Since security will often need to be customized anyway, this should make it easier
to see what you are likely to need to customize.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Mime
View raw message