Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Received:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer;
  b=UuYTO6NrdzexpO/5wvVfB4K/9LFg5BYSCSQQy5JebcrZkrndDnxmx9mwr6UIASWlw0ZXWdmddhHIjIdhU/wpkxFKsdZwkETkQYLoztXOVsTwTlGuaBrJ4pFvY3YXSFPE7c1YEIzRApBd0mKtmUarvJVmmOX/hcWv4EYciUuOSJU=
  ;
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622)
In-Reply-To: <430A3C97.40200@apache.org>
References: <b8be5cfce1cd29c76c14d8458a54617c@yahoo.com>
 <430A3C97.40200@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <ea61c6c4d898f3d4a4ea8c70ada0f87e@yahoo.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Web container-specific configuration
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:11:43 -0700
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org


On Aug 22, 2005, at 1:59 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:

> David Jencks wrote:
>
>> How will the proposed container specific config work?  I'll add an 
>> any element in the geronimo-web schema, and each builder will look 
>> for its own namespace and interpret it as appropriate.  This will 
>> allow one plan to be deployed on multiple web containers.
>
>> comments?
>
> It seems to be the simplest solution at the moment, so +1 for the 
> idea. I'm definitely looking forward to seeing the change to figure 
> out how exactly the namespace differentiation works. Is it already 
> used elsewhere so I could look at it and experiment?

There's something similar but considerably more generic in the 
service-builder for xml-attributes and xml-references

Anyway, should be done fairly soon :-)

thanks
david jencks

>
>> david jencks
>
> Jacek
>