Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99778 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2005 03:29:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Aug 2005 03:29:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 9691 invoked by uid 500); 27 Aug 2005 03:29:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 9639 invoked by uid 500); 27 Aug 2005 03:29:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 9625 invoked by uid 99); 27 Aug 2005 03:29:03 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 20:29:03 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [66.250.40.202] (HELO saturn.opentools.org) (66.250.40.202) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 20:29:19 -0700 Received: by saturn.opentools.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 74A6D3F7F; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 23:45:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.opentools.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF3BF3B5 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 23:45:41 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 23:45:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Aaron Mulder X-X-Sender: ammulder@saturn.opentools.org To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Woo-hoo! Down to 100 JIRA's with no target release. :) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sorry for the JIRA spam. I went through a bunch and assigned releases to them. I found a substantial number that I'd like someone to review for M5, so when someone said earlier "I asked everyone to review their JIRA issues so I'm sure anything left with no target is unimportant", well, that's not really true. Most of the ones I newly marked for M5 looked like quick "review and close" types. There are a couple that may need work if they're not fixed (such as allowing access to WEB-INF/*), but generally if we review one of these for M5 and conclude that it's not fixed then I think we can just push it back to v1.0. But I'd rather not leave them hanging out there indefinitely if they're actually fixed. Anyway, I'll try to go through and assign targets to the other 100 eventually, but if anyone beats me to it, that would be great. :) Thanks, Aaron