Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 71284 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2005 21:30:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Aug 2005 21:30:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 92724 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2005 21:30:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 92690 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2005 21:30:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 92677 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2005 21:30:08 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 14:30:08 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [66.163.170.8] (HELO smtp110.mail.sc5.yahoo.com) (66.163.170.8) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 14:30:22 -0700 Received: (qmail 33498 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2005 21:30:05 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer; b=EBsc5tc85/g6/FkkPcp3VTlLmIIGpg8TzLSuMzSVW4deqxXX5+Iei1Nb5zNxaUm0GLetdzMdubH90fX0VHqY3O7xxw28d4YZTnRrxV30kJuzB/qnN+B9hPplhS1dhSS7CLf/Me2o72FFOkdVOLIoGm81R1Q9Vb+xOkk8VfrekJI= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.105?) (david?jencks@66.93.38.137 with plain) by smtp110.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Aug 2005 21:30:05 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) In-Reply-To: <4059E7FE-2307-4BB0-9891-BBFD2EFF9420@visi.com> References: <43149417.1010209@savoirtech.com> <26D5A807-F750-46F8-83C5-25D30E1F3EA5@visi.com> <0BF37EDB-EB21-4540-8821-C85E3BA9A0C8@visi.com> <4059E7FE-2307-4BB0-9891-BBFD2EFF9420@visi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <60d03e1e5a0d97e38320d46b73aab6e9@yahoo.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Jencks Subject: Re: M5 List Closure - GBeanName Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 14:30:02 -0700 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Aug 30, 2005, at 2:20 PM, David Blevins wrote: > > On Aug 30, 2005, at 2:17 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote: > >> On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, David Blevins wrote: >> >>>> >>>> I think the full conversion of "all ObjectNames to GBeanNames >>>> and >>>> all queries to GBeanQuery's" can wait for post-M5. >>>> >>> >>> Ok, you're confusing me. The message "post-M5" is exactly where I >>> thought that conversation ended up. What part shouldn't wait for >>> post-M5? >>> >> >> This part: >> >> >>> Uh, no. I think we should make GBeanName satisfactory, and put >>> all the plumbing into GBeanQuery to support the queries we want and >>> deprecate the kernel ObjectName query methods. >> > > Ok, so what we need consensus on is whether we should for M5: > > 1) Complete GBeanName support and officially deprecate ObjectName use > and convert fully post-M5. I'd prefer this if possible. > > 2) Wait till post-M5 and do all at once. this would be my second choice. david jencks >