Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy includes SPF record at
 spf.trusted-forwarder.org)
Message-ID: <430CCC11.8050304@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 15:35:45 -0400
From: Sachin Patel <sppatel2@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0+ (Windows/20050712)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: tooling patches
References: <430A6B4A.7050504@gmail.com> <430B9665.8000005@gmail.com>
 <0470B72C-287A-45D3-9950-2FEEA8611B22@apache.org>
 <430C8C68.2000503@gmail.com>
 <F9582E32-7141-4957-ABDC-57814FB56A8D@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <F9582E32-7141-4957-ABDC-57814FB56A8D@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Please see if you can apply 889 & 909 as well.  889 introduces a new 
file, so I'm curious to see if theres problems applying that one.

Thanks.

Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
> On Aug 24, 2005, at 11:04 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:
>
>> I was using the Eclipse UI Subversion plugin to create the patches,  
>> and it seems to put absolute paths in the patch file which may have  
>> caused your errors.  Let me create a new jira and I'll submit  
>> patches using "svn diff" for the .core and .ui plugins.
>
> Well, I was able to deal with the absolute paths.  That's workable.   
> (the -p flag)
>
> But even then, it it had problems w/ the chunks.  I thought it may be  
> a line ending issues (DOS vs Unix vs Mac), but no such luck.
>
> lets try with something simple when I get home to figure out the real  
> prolbem
>
> geir
>
>>
>> Thanks.  Sachin.
>>
>> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>
>>> Patches?  We don't need no steenkeeng patches...
>>>
>>> 884 - please resubmit and grant ASF license
>>> 885 - I couldn't get this to apply successfully.  I'm not sure  
>>> why.   Most chunks failed.
>>> 888 - done
>>> 907 - failed like 885.  I figured I'm doing something wrong, but  
>>> it's  just not obvious.
>>>
>>> geir
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 23, 2005, at 5:34 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Add 907 to the list.  Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Sachin Patel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Would one of the committers mind checking in the patches for   
>>>>> 884,885, and 888?  I'm making changes on source files that  
>>>>> already  have existing pending patches in these jiras and don't  
>>>>> want to  introduce new patches until their checked to avoid  
>>>>> conflicts when  merging.  For my knowledge, how is this handled?  
>>>>> Are cumulative  patches easily handled?  i.e What happens if i  
>>>>> have Patch-A based  on revision 1 on File-A.  Then I introduce  
>>>>> Patch-B on File-A also  based on revision 1 (but includes  changes 
>>>>> that went into Patch  A).  Since both of the patches are  based on 
>>>>> the same revision # I  would assume that only one of  the patches 
>>>>> can be applied without  errors or conflicts.  What  happens when 
>>>>> the second patch is  applied since the patch is no  longer based 
>>>>> on the revision  specified in the patch file? If  the second patch 
>>>>> cannot be  applied, how is one expected to know  which patch to 
>>>>> throw out?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sachin.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>