Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 89268 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2005 16:47:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Aug 2005 16:47:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 91564 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2005 16:47:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 91515 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2005 16:47:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 91502 invoked by uid 99); 21 Aug 2005 16:47:22 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 09:47:22 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [209.233.18.245] (HELO buttons.boynes.com) (209.233.18.245) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 09:47:40 -0700 Received: from [192.168.37.199] (unknown [192.168.37.199]) by buttons.boynes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26FE51922D for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 09:47:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4308B017.3090708@apache.org> Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 09:47:19 -0700 From: Jeremy Boynes User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.1.fc3 (X11/20050720) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Hello and Where To Start References: <20050817124150.78587.qmail@web25706.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050817124150.78587.qmail@web25706.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Thomas P. Fuller wrote: > What's the status of the work manager API? > > I get the impression that there's been no development > of this framework? > > I have an email from Rahul Tyagi on June 28th and > haven't seen much active discussion on this topic > since then. Yesterday there was some discussion going > back and forth regarding thread pools vs. work > manager, but this was not a discussion re: the > implementation of the work manager api. > > This could be a good place to start if the task still > needs to be completed. > > Any thoughts? > Still catching up on email after vacation but the last I recall here (from July/early Aug) was that someone was going to post a strawman. -- Jeremy