Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-15278-apmail-geronimo-dev-archive=geronimo.apache.org@geronimo.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 86586 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2005 05:48:38 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Aug 2005 05:48:38 -0000
Received: (qmail 55104 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2005 05:48:31 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 55053 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2005 05:48:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@geronimo.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@geronimo.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@geronimo.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
List-Id: <dev.geronimo.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 55039 invoked by uid 99); 3 Aug 2005 05:48:31 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 22:48:31 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Received: from [72.10.34.3] (HELO ss53.shared.server-system.net) (72.10.34.3)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 22:48:21 -0700
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (c-24-4-205-190.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.205.190])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by ss53.shared.server-system.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
 j735mRBO009844
	for <dev@geronimo.apache.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 22:48:28 -0700
Message-ID: <42F05AAB.5050807@toolazydogs.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 22:48:27 -0700
From: "Alan D. Cabrera" <list@toolazydogs.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Naming schema "port" elements
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0508022012360.18370@saturn.opentools.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0508022012360.18370@saturn.opentools.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

On 8/2/2005 5:19 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:

>	So our our naming schema, when dealing with web services, has an 
>unfortunate overlap with two different "port" elements that are subtlely 
>different:
>
><service-ref>
>  <service-ref-name />
>  <service-completion>
>    <service-name />
>    <port> (def #1, portCompletionType)
>      (contents of port #2)
>      <binding-name />
>    </port>
>  </service-completion>
>  <port>  (def #2)
>    ...
>  </port>
></service-ref>
>
>	In other words, the first "port" element contains all the same 
>stuff as the second "port" element plus one extra element.
>
>	I think it would be preferable to have what's currently the first 
>"port" look like this:
>
><port-completion>
>  <port ... />
>  <binding-name />
></port-completion>
>
>	That way both "port" elements would be identical.
>
>	Any objections to making this change in M5?
>
>  
>
Nope.


Regards,
Alan