Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Message-ID: <1290524890.1123119995439.JavaMail.jira@ajax.apache.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 03:46:35 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Aaron Mulder (JIRA)" <dev@geronimo.apache.org>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-836) jmx port should be explicit in the
 plans and set from the installer
In-Reply-To: <653777885.1122933519910.JavaMail.jira@ajax.apache.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-836?page=all ]
     
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-836:
-----------------------------------

    Resolution: Invalid

The deployer connects via the RMI Naming port (1099).  If there's another port involved, please let me know.

> jmx port should be explicit in the plans and set from the installer
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: GERONIMO-836
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-836
>      Project: Geronimo
>         Type: Bug
>   Components: installer
>     Versions: 1.0-M5
>     Reporter: David Jencks
>     Assignee: Aaron Mulder
>      Fix For: 1.0-M5

>
> I think the only port that is not configured by the installer is the jmx port used by the deployer (and similar tools).  If this port was configurable by the installer you could use the installer to set up multiple geronimos on one machine.  Dain says the jmx port can actually be included in the url so this should be an easy change.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira