geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dain Sundstrom <d...@iq80.com>
Subject Re: Network Properties & Naming
Date Tue, 23 Aug 2005 03:56:50 GMT
+1 These are my sentiments as well.

-dain

On Aug 22, 2005, at 7:31 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:

>     I disagree -- I think it's important to have a common management
> interface (currently, for example, NetworkConnector), and having  
> the same
> properties called something different in every networkable GBean  
> totally
> defeats that.
>
> Aaron
>
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>
>> Jeff Genender wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I am simply asking that we use a term that is not as ambiguous.   
>>> In Tomcat
>>> land, they use the word "address" on the Connectors.  Host is  
>>> referenced
>>> throughout the plans and refers to a Host Tomcat object and a  
>>> Host GBean.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Sounds to me that Tomcat users have one set of terms, Jetty users
>> another, and who knows what other people use.
>>
>> Rather that trying to pick one name for all which pleases none, we
>> should let each container configuration use terms familiar to its  
>> users.
>> That way people who want Tomcat see things Tomcat-esque and people  
>> who
>> want Jetty see Jetty-esque names.
>>
>> This should apply to all naming: the container configuration, the
>> connectors/listeners, the deployment plans, the console, ...
>>
>> --
>> Jeremy
>>
>


Mime
View raw message