geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark <delafran_j...@hotmail.com>
Subject Re: interop-server-plan.xml and izpack installer questions
Date Wed, 03 Aug 2005 13:44:08 GMT
sissonj@insession.com wrote:

>
> David Jencks <djencks@gluecode.com> wrote on 03/08/2005 01:17:40 AM:
>
> >
> > On Aug 2, 2005, at 6:35 AM, sissonj@insession.com wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I noticed that the izpack installer has an "EJB/IIOP Configuration"
> > > panel where the user can configure things such as:
> > >
> > > * Naming port
> > > * EJB port
> > > * IP addresses the server should accept EJB Client connections from
> > > * IIOP port
> > > * ORB port
> > > * CosNaming port
> > >
> > > Even though I am prompted for Corba config information, the
> > > org/apache/geronimo/InteropServer configuration isn't started when
> > > Geronimo is started, which isn't intuitive.  Should we be starting 
> the
> > > configurations that they configure in the installer?
> >
> > The org/apache/geronimo/InteropServer relates to the code in the
> > geronimo interop module, which we aren't using at the moment.  The
> > actual CORBA support is entirely in openejb and uses the Sun orb.
>
> Should we delete this plan to avoid users being confused (since the 
> plans are available to users (who used the izpack installer) in the 
> geronimo/installer-temp directory.


Yes, we can delete the plan. 

Mark

>
> > >
> > > Should the Interop config be optional (have it as a pack you can
> > > select at the beginning) and the IIOP port, ORB port and CosNaming
> > > port on a separate screen?
> >
> > I think it would probably be appropriate to put the openejb corba
> > support in a separate corba module but it is most likely to be a
> > separate openejb corba module.  At that time making it optional seems
> > reasonable.  I doubt this will happen before 1.0
>
> I'll raise a JIRA issue for 1.1 to separate the openejb corba module, 
> so we don't forget.
>
> > >
> > > I also noticed that in the following change, the interop server was
> > > removed from the assembly.  Can anyone give some more background on
> > > this?
> >
> > As noted above, we aren't using it for anything.  The generated code
> > (using the IDL compiler) is now in a spec module.
> >
> > thanks
> > david jencks
> > >
> > > Revision: 159233
> > > Author: adc
> > > Date: 10:58:39 PM, Monday, 28 March 2005
> > > Message:
> > > Temporarily turned off.
> > > ----
> > > Modified : /geronimo/trunk/modules/assembly/maven.xml
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > John



Mime
View raw message