geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: M5 List Closure - GBeanName
Date Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:30:02 GMT

On Aug 30, 2005, at 2:20 PM, David Blevins wrote:

>
> On Aug 30, 2005, at 2:17 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, David Blevins wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>>     I think the full conversion of "all ObjectNames to GBeanNames 
>>>> and
>>>> all queries to GBeanQuery's" can wait for post-M5.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ok, you're confusing me.  The message "post-M5" is exactly where I
>>> thought that conversation ended up.  What part shouldn't wait for
>>> post-M5?
>>>
>>
>> This part:
>>
>>
>>>      Uh, no.  I think we should make GBeanName satisfactory, and put
>>> all the plumbing into GBeanQuery to support the queries we want and
>>> deprecate the kernel ObjectName query methods.
>>
>
> Ok, so what we need consensus on is whether we should for M5:
>
> 1)  Complete GBeanName support and officially deprecate ObjectName use 
> and convert fully post-M5.

I'd prefer this if possible.
>
> 2)  Wait till post-M5 and do all at once.

this would be my second choice.

david jencks

>


Mime
View raw message