geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Should we have our own socket listeners?
Date Sat, 13 Aug 2005 21:28:42 GMT

On Aug 13, 2005, at 12:44 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:

> Aaron's recent thread on SSL has made we wonder if we should  
> consider providing our own socket listeners for HTTP(S) and other  
> protocols rather than using the ones supplied by the containers we  
> are embedding.

I was thinking about this too.  I never figured out how resource  
management could work otherwise.

>
> Reasons for doing it include:
> * ability to integrate with custom work managers (thread pools) and
>   SSL infrastructure
> * consistency across all embedded containers
> * potential for multi-protocol support on one end-point
>   (i.e. multiplexing everything over one port like WebLogic does which
>   can make life easier when firewalls are involved)

bleah...  As long as it throws a   
ManThatIsAReallyBadIdeaButWhoAreWeToTellYouWhatToDoException


> * potential for integrating with custom QoS frameworks e.g. allowing
>   custom negotiation with load-balancers in a clustered environment
> * potential for hi-av version upgrades where we can version in a
>   upgraded component and hand off the physical socket resulting in
>   no loss of availability
>
> Note that none of those features are HTTP specific.
>
> The downside of course is that it may weaken integration between  
> the listener and the container being embedded; for some containers  
> they may be so closely coupled that doing this will actually make  
> things difficult. For example, I think doing this would be fairly  
> easy for Jetty, I don't know how easy it would be for Tomcat,  
> OpenEJB, JMX, ActiveMQ etc.
>

We should look (or people can tell us...).  I think it's a good idea.

geir

> --
> Jeremy
>
>

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org



Mime
View raw message