geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sachin Patel <sppat...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: progress on mavenizing eclipse plugins
Date Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:34:29 GMT
Due to the current debates :) I'm trying to do both M1 and M2 in 
parallel, but probably M2 will be finished first.

Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
> On Aug 29, 2005, at 9:43 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Sachin Patel wrote:
>>
>>> So after sitting down yesterday and doing a little reading... I  
>>> have a much better understanding of Maven. :) I've decided to go  
>>> with using M2, one of the reasons which I'm probably going to end  
>>> up having to write a plugin and want to avoid massive jelly  
>>> scripts. :)
>>>
>>
>> Hang on there...
>>
>> Although I like your enthusiasm regarding M2, and I personally  can't 
>> wait to start converting over to M2, we really need to keep  the 
>> thoughts of the end users in our development.  To have to  download 2 
>> build tools in order build all of Geronimo, IMHO, is  very bad.  I 
>> hope that you rethink this and do it in M1.  We are  here to help you 
>> in getting your project up and running.  There is  nothing you cannot 
>> do in M1...
>>
>> If we have a rollout schedule for moving Geronimo to M2, then I  
>> would be open to this.  But unfortunately its not officially on the  
>> radar.  I would only ask that we are consistent in the build tool  
>> selection.
>
> Jeff,
>
> I respectfully disagree with you here.  I see your point about making  
> it easy for users, but overall, how many users will want to build the  
> plugin in the time between now and getting Geronimo over to M2?  I  
> know we don't know that latter time yet, but I think it's Soon(tm),  
> and I assume that peeps focused on working on the plugin will be a  
> different set of people building the server....
>
> OTOH, what is the *fastest* way to get this to build?
>
> Also, will M2 build M1 projects?  (Oh, please, please, please say it  
> will...)
>
> geir
>
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>>
>>> M1 provided a convenient jar override feature where I could the  
>>> specify the explicit path to dependencies outside of the repo.   
>>> This makes things easier as I can just point to the ${eclipse- 
>>> home}/plugins/blah.jar.  Unfortunately M2 doesn't have this.  So  
>>> after talking to some of the very helpful Maven folks, the only  
>>> current way to do this is to have the eclipse jars inside the  local 
>>> repo.  To make it even more painful, from looks of things I  don't 
>>> think I can just can't download an eclipse image, and do a  
>>> "select-all" and copy in the all jars.  It looks like I'm going to  
>>> have to create the "maven convention" path for each jar.
>>> So from an Eclipse install, for each plugin I would need to copy  
>>> and rename the jar from
>>> ${eclipse-install}/eclipse/plugins/ 
>>> org.eclipse.core.resources_3.1.0.jar
>>> to...
>>> ${local_repo}/eclipse-plugins/org.eclipse.core.resources/3.1.0/ 
>>> org.eclipse.core.resources-3.1.0.jar I'm still having issues  though 
>>> as even when I try to build offline it is attempting to  download 
>>> from the remote repo the dependency's .pom, and thus the  build 
>>> fails.  Sent a note on the Maven dev list for a solution to  prevent 
>>> it from doing this and look directly in the local repo.
>>> Thanks and will give an update when I make further progress.
>>> Sachin.
>>>
>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message