geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <l...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-851) Move Geronimo Build to M2 (Maven 2)
Date Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:56:56 GMT
I think that some work can be done investigating where the jelly lies.  
We can then add sub-tasks to track their conversion.  All of this can be 
done w/out interfering with the M5 release.


Regards,
Alan

Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote, On 8/17/2005 9:54 AM:

> Thx.
>
> I think we should consider choosing appropriate timing - it sounds  
> like a big effort, and how does this fit into what we want to do w/  
> M5, 1.0, etc  I was going to suggest voting on even doing this, but I  
> can't imagine that at *some* point in the future, we don't want to be  
> on M2, so we will go there eventually.  it's just a matter of when...
>
> geir
>
> On Aug 17, 2005, at 12:42 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>
>> To be a little more specific, maven 1 and maven 2 can both work  with 
>> maven 2 POMs.  It's our non-standard jelly code that impedes  our 
>> conversion.  We need to enumerate where that code is, determine  if 
>> there is an M2 replacement for it, it not decide if we need it  and 
>> if we do, make a plug in or convert the code.
>> It is my understanding that much of the jelly code is  optimizations, 
>> e.g. don't run tests if they've already been run.   The maven team is 
>> happy to make such optimizations a priority to  include in M2.
>>
>> After the conversion, I hope that we have no more jelly.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote, On 8/17/2005 9:34 AM:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Normally, yes.  Unfortunately there is a lot of jelly code out there.
>>>
>>> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote, On 8/17/2005 9:15 AM:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Is it backwards compatible?
>>>>
>>>> IOW, can people that use M1 also still work?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>



Mime
View raw message