geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Genender <>
Subject Re: Console dies in Tomcat
Date Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:44:07 GMT

Aaron Mulder wrote:
> 	I like option 3 (create new TomcatJAASRealm if there's not one 
> running already).

Thats very doable.  The TomcatJAASRealm, BTW, is just an adapter to 
JAAS, its not really creating a security problem.

The only issues here it safe to assume that its JAAS it will be 
using as opposed to another type of security?  If so, then this is an 
easy implementation.

DJ and Alan, I would definately like to get your input on this as 
well...since its a security thing.


> Aaron
> On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Jeff Genender wrote:
>>2 issues here...
>>The first error is:
>>07:50:02,076 ERROR [ContextConfig] Parse error in application web.xml
>>java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Servlet mapping specifies an unknown 
>>servlet name DerbyUsers
>>The second error is:
>>07:50:02,083 ERROR [StandardContext] Context [/console-standard] startup 
>>failed due to previous errors
>>[******> ] 88%  37s Starting org/apache/geronimo/Console 
>>07:50:02,499 WARN  [TomcatContainer] security-realm-name was specified 
>>but no RealmGBean was configured for this context.  Ignoring 
>>I have no idea about the first error...possibly a web.xml issue?  Ideas 
>>on this?
>>The second error is about an issue we discussed about a week ago.  It 
>>has to do with how we name realms.  Tomcat is saying I don't see any 
>>geronimo realms that are named like the Host or it wants a 
>>TomcatRealm GBean set at the context level so it can change the name to 
>>what the <security-realm-name> states it is.
>>3 options here on this second issue...
>>1) I can change the default engine name to match the geronimo realmName.
>>2) We can change the realmName for the geronimo realm to something 
>> "Geronimo"...and I can be sure it matches the Engine 
>>(which it would at that point).
>>3) I can dynamically create a TomcatJAASRealm GBean if one does not 
>>exist when this condition arises...which IMHO is quite extreme.

View raw message