geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <l...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject Re: milestone branching and taging (was Re: svn commit: r226882 - in /geronimo: branches/v1_0_M4-QA/ tags/v1_0_M4/)
Date Wed, 03 Aug 2005 22:26:27 GMT
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote, On 8/3/2005 1:57 PM:

>
> On Aug 3, 2005, at 4:14 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 09:04:22AM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
>> There is never going to be another release from the M4-QA branch.
>> It's a dead branch and shouldn't be updated after we vote to release
>> the M4 binaries.
>
>
> Why wouldn't we set a process that's standard and stick with it?
>
> Further, it's entirely reasonable to keep our option open for a  
> subsequent release of M4.  Remember M3?  And what if we find a major  
> problem?  We don't want to ram forward a M5 - we'd want to fix M4 and  
> get that out there, retracting the problematic release, say a M4r1.

This makes sense to me.


Regards,
Alan





Mime
View raw message