geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <l...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject Re: Issue - configuring the binary distribution
Date Tue, 02 Aug 2005 19:45:59 GMT
On 8/1/2005 4:30 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:

>On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, David Jencks wrote:
>  
>
>>So far I am really against adding gbeans to existing configurations.  I 
>>don't have a problem with the web console generating entirely new 
>>configurations, although I doubt it is all that useful.  My opinions 
>>can always be argued against :-)
>>    
>>
>
>	It seems like Jeremy and I came to a mutually satisfactory
>conclusion where (and I'm summarizing in haste) altering the configuration
>(including adding/removing) would be possible, but it would also be
>possible to flag specific configurations as not alterable and give them a
>specific version number and all.  I think that's the best of both worlds
>-- if you want it editable, you use the standard behavior.  If you want it
>locked down so you can guarantee that a deployment performed on machine X
>will work when exported and imported into machine Y, then you freeze the
>configurations you're dealing with and build machines X and Y from those.
>
>	I will apply a little elbow grease to getting David J on board 
>this week.  :)
>  
>
This sounds interesting to me.


Regards,
Alan


Mime
View raw message