geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Rick McGuire (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-940) Dual contribution code in Geronimo has pedigree questions.
Date Mon, 29 Aug 2005 10:13:05 GMT
     [ ]

Rick McGuire updated GERONIMO-940:


> Dual contribution code in Geronimo has pedigree questions.
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>          Key: GERONIMO-940
>          URL:
>      Project: Geronimo
>         Type: Bug
>   Components: common, kernel
>     Versions: 1.0-M5, 1.0
>  Environment: All
>     Reporter: Rick McGuire
>  Attachments:
> There are a number of Geronimo classes that have also been contributed into the JBoss
code base.  These dual-contribution classes raise some pedigree and licensing conflict questions
and should be replaced with cleanroom versions.  Attached are cleanroom versions of the problem
> In addition to these replacement classes, the files in the packages org.apache.geronimo.system.url.file
and org.apache.geronimo.system.url.resource also have a similar problem.  However, these classes
are not actually being used by Geronimo, and should just be removed rather than deleted. 
Removal of these requires a patch to GeronimoURLFactory, which is also attached.  NOTE:  The
class GeronimoURLFactory has some JVM portability issues, and it's not clear that this URL
factory is really required any more.  If possible, it might be best to remove that class also.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
For more information on JIRA, see:

View raw message