I'm sorry, but I can't understand what you are proposing. Can you
provide a schema fragment for the elements you want to change?
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 2, 2005, at 5:19 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
> So our our naming schema, when dealing with web services, has an
> unfortunate overlap with two different "port" elements that are
> subtlely
> different:
>
> <service-ref>
> <service-ref-name />
> <service-completion>
> <service-name />
> <port> (def #1, portCompletionType)
> (contents of port #2)
> <binding-name />
> </port>
> </service-completion>
> <port> (def #2)
> ...
> </port>
> </service-ref>
>
> In other words, the first "port" element contains all the same
> stuff as the second "port" element plus one extra element.
>
> I think it would be preferable to have what's currently the first
> "port" look like this:
>
> <port-completion>
> <port ... />
> <binding-name />
> </port-completion>
>
> That way both "port" elements would be identical.
>
> Any objections to making this change in M5?
>
> Thanks,
> Aaron
>
|