geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Blevins <>
Subject Re: M5 List Closure - Console Support
Date Tue, 30 Aug 2005 20:14:38 GMT
Some discussion has occurred on how we want to role out the console  
in M5.

On Aug 26, 2005, at 5:54 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
>     So I updated the console status on the Wiki:
>     Basically, there's a lot of work yet to go.  I've put some work
> into web server, logging, and JMS server portlets so far, and Joe's
> pitched in a bit as well, but I don't think I'd really say there's any
> page there that's fully working and satisfactory.
>     As far as M5 goes, I think we'll do what we do in the time frame
> we end up having.  I think it's going to be a "technology preview" in
> every sense.  I don't think it makes sense to hold M5 until the  
> console is
> "done" or to try to cut down the console to the stuff that actually  
> works
> right.  Still, it wouldn't break my heart if M5 took a while so we  
> could
> get more done on the console.  :)

On Aug 26, 2005, at 7:02 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
>     Well, OK, after talking about this a bit more, it seems like
> there's some interest in picking certain features we'd defintiely  
> like to
> have in the console for M5.

On Aug 27, 2005, at 11:15 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

> I think we should clearly state that the console is a "Technology  
> Preview", and point the users to JIRA to file feature requests.

I assume there would be no arguments against clearly communicating  
(via labeling, some page in the console, release notes, or all of the  
above and more) that the console is a "Technology Preview."

So what looks like what still is open for consensus is do we:

1) Take the time pick certain features and hold the release till they  
are done.

2) Do what we do in the time frame we end up having.

View raw message