Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 20134 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2005 17:24:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jul 2005 17:24:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 60246 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2005 17:24:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 60186 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2005 17:24:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 60172 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jul 2005 17:24:50 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:24:50 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [64.14.202.141] (HELO mgd.gluecode.com) (64.14.202.141) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:24:45 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.105] (dsl093-038-137.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.38.137]) (authenticated bits=0) by mgd.gluecode.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6JHNmCW002562 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:23:48 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) In-Reply-To: <6C37E0BD-7227-4F09-AF80-B30EE0AEC2FE@visi.com> References: <6C37E0BD-7227-4F09-AF80-B30EE0AEC2FE@visi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Jencks Subject: Re: Outstanding tasks for M4 Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:24:46 -0700 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N what is the proper use of Jira for defects that occur in multiple branches/releases? There are at least 2 issues fixed in head that need to be backported GERONIMO-645 GERONIMO-768 Also, I suggest that anyone changing a dependency version in M4 should do the same in head at the same time. vice versa I'm less concerned about thanks david jencks On Jul 19, 2005, at 10:03 AM, David Blevins wrote: > On Jul 19, 2005, at 7:06 AM, sissonj@insession.com wrote: > >> >> Can everyone please check that any work they are planning on doing >> for the M4 release is listed when you view the open issues for the >> 1.0-M4 version, so we don't have any last minute surprises. >> > > I pulled down the list of outstanding issues for M4: > > GERONIMO-518 Deploying Struts app fails on Logging > ClassCastException > GERONIMO-664 Tomcat need webservices integrated > GERONIMO-746 Move from commons_discovery SNAPSHOT to formal version > GERONIMO-741 Move from ActiveIO 1.0 to ActiveIO 1.1 > GERONIMO-740 Move from ActiveMQ 3.1-SNAPSHOT to a formal release > GERONIMO-755 Move from Scout (JAXR) version 1.0-SNAPSHOT to a > formal version > GERONIMO-756 Move ServiceMix from 1.0-SNAPSHOT to a formal or > dated/versioned release for Geronimo M4 > GERONIMO-757 Move from jUDDI SNAPSHOT to formal version > GERONIMO-745 Move from Axis 1.3-SNAPSHOT to formal version > GERONIMO-760 Move tmporb SNAPSHOT dependency to a dated version in > M4 Geronimo & OpenEJB branches > GERONIMO-728 Jetty gives misleading NPE on "port in use" condition > GERONIMO-772 Move OpenEJB from jelly velocity tags SNAPSHOT to > version 1.0 > GERONIMO-771 Move from custom cglib build version HEAD-06-06-05 to > cglib-nodep-2.1_2.jar > > In that list, these are the only two non-dependency related items: > GERONIMO-664 Tomcat need webservices integrated > GERONIMO-728 Jetty gives misleading NPE on "port in use" condition > > Could I humbly submit that GERONIMO-664 is a new feature that could > simply be documented as not working for M4? > > We could probably get the dependencies cleared up today and the CTS > testing started and (knocking on wood) the release out by the end of > the week. > > -David >