Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 41153 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2005 02:35:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jul 2005 02:35:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 44461 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2005 02:35:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 44418 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2005 02:35:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 44403 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2005 02:35:39 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:35:39 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [66.250.40.202] (HELO saturn.opentools.org) (66.250.40.202) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:35:32 -0700 Received: by saturn.opentools.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 101143E94; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:43:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.opentools.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094D8F377 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:43:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:43:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Aaron Mulder X-X-Sender: ammulder@saturn.opentools.org To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: EJB Relationship Mapping Names Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N What's the purpose of the ejb-relation-name and ejb-relationship-role-name elements at: openejb-jar/relationships/ejb-relation/ejb-relation-name openejb-jar/relationships/ejb-relation/ejb-relationship-role/ ejb-relationship-role-name It seems that we ignore those, and don't validate them against each other even if they're present in both ejb-jar.xml and openejb-jar.xml (they're optional in both files). I guess it could be used for "documentation", but then I'd prefer to make it a description element instead of something that looks like it ought to be present. Thanks, Aaron