Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730)
In-Reply-To: <42D33169.9080503@toolazydogs.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0507112144060.17586@saturn.opentools.org>
 <3FD9DE78-7281-4086-8055-F584CCAD9044@apache.org>
 <42D33169.9080503@toolazydogs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <8F3F4CE1-34FD-4999-A879-AE44DB3472C7@apache.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." <geirm@apache.org>
Subject: Re: Donations & Policies
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 11:12:47 -0400
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org


On Jul 11, 2005, at 10:56 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:

[SNIP]

>
>
>>>     After giving the whole issue some more thought, I think I would
>>> prefer the TriFork code go to the incubator.  I'm fine going  
>>> either  way
>>> with the web console (incubator or "sandbox area" with own ACL).   
>>> I  guess
>>> that means that if we need a single policy/guideline, I'd lean   
>>> toward the
>>> incubator.
>>>
>>
>>
> I don't see the value add in going directly to the incubator unless  
> they wanted to graduate as a TLP out of the gate.  If this is the  
> case, then they wouldn't have bothered us to begin w/.
>

Just a comment -

yes - that's something we need to get a handle on - what's the value  
to send off to Incubator unless it will be some kind of TLP or a  
distinct, standalone community of some sort.

I don't wish to see our subprojects, if we add them, be formally  
distinct sub-communities of Geronimo.

geir

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org