Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 92521 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2005 06:37:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 2005 06:37:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 32509 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2005 06:36:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 32439 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2005 06:36:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 32411 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2005 06:36:56 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:36:56 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [64.14.202.141] (HELO mgd.gluecode.com) (64.14.202.141) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:36:49 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.105] (dsl093-038-137.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.38.137]) (authenticated bits=0) by mgd.gluecode.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6L6ZqCW004386 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:35:53 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <817c10fb68beb13a6dbd3fac702f3073@gluecode.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Jencks Subject: Re: Comment in j2ee-server-plan.xml about jetty in M4 Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:36:51 -0700 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N yes, remove it. that's very historical :-) At one time there was a primitive soap listener in openejb. Then there was a special port for ws on jetty. now ws runs through the normal web port, either jetty or tomcat. david jencks On Jul 20, 2005, at 11:30 PM, sissonj@insession.com wrote: > Should the comment below be removed from the file? If not, can someone > explain where Jetty is involved here. > > Should we be able to run M4 with tomcat without any jetty use at all? > > > > Thanks, > > John >