Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99884 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2005 10:38:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2005 10:38:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 79906 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2005 10:38:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 79865 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2005 10:38:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 79847 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2005 10:38:22 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 03:38:22 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [128.241.244.71] (HELO chi.mobile-health-diary.com) (128.241.244.71) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 03:38:19 -0700 Received: (qmail 7127 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2005 10:38:18 -0000 Received: from ool-43560634.dyn.optonline.net (HELO ?10.0.1.2?) (geir@67.86.6.52) by b014.internal.mobile-health-diary.com with SMTP; 11 Jul 2005 10:38:18 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730) In-Reply-To: References: <46f11960507100442166bc0f2@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <555441F8-2ED9-4EBA-BDF8-49B0950979F1@apache.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." Subject: Re: ToDos for M4 Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 06:38:22 -0400 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Jul 10, 2005, at 10:02 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > > On Jul 10, 2005, at 4:42 AM, mos wrote: > > >> Just some thoughts: >> >> Shouldn't well known and essential bugs be fixed before doing the >> branch? >> This could prevent duplicated work. >> For example: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-715 >> > > I think that we should update the M4 roadmap to reflect what we > really think is needed before we kick this out the door, i.e. > branch. There are things in there that I'm not sure that we'll > complete in the timeframe that we want for M4. > > There are also things like 715 that people want to go out for M4. Well, how about doing a more formal M5 very soon with a clearer roadmap? > > >> Bye the way: >> Would the subprojects like OpenEJB be part of the branch of M4? >> I assume this because this modules are an essential part of geronimo >> and have to be closely synchronized with the rest. >> >> > > OpenEJB is not a sub-project of Geronimo. However, we should use a > specific version of OpenEJB in our M4 branch. +1 > What I think that what could be done is that we could build a > snapshot of OpenEJB and label the version w/ a timestamp. We would > then upload the jar into a maven repo, preferably ibiblio. I assume "we" == "OpenEJB people at OpenEJB project"? "we" == "Geronimo project" shouldn't be doing releases on behalf of other projects, but I don't think you meant that. geir -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 geirm@apache.org