Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 93135 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2005 15:12:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2005 15:12:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 15439 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2005 15:12:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 15403 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2005 15:12:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 15390 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2005 15:12:23 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 08:12:23 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [209.233.18.245] (HELO buttons.boynes.com) (209.233.18.245) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 08:12:18 -0700 Received: from [192.168.37.199] (unknown [192.168.37.199]) by buttons.boynes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E83D1624C for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 08:12:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42DE69D3.6060605@apache.org> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 08:12:19 -0700 From: Jeremy Boynes User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-1.3.3 (X11/20050513) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Disagreements regarding inclusion of Tomcat/Jetty Picker in M4 QA branch References: <42DE629F.5000206@savoirtech.com> In-Reply-To: <42DE629F.5000206@savoirtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Jeff Genender wrote: > Ok...fair enough...then how far out would M5 be (estimates)? IMHO, > waiting for the time between M3->M4 cannot be between M4-> M5. If it is > going to be that long, then +1000 to get it in now. If its a fairly > short period, then waiting will not be a big deal. > Blevins was talking about release early, often. Adding this change in can only delay M4 and as we are talking M5 in just a few weeks I would say stick with the current branch and use this as an incentive to get M5 out soon. -- Jeremy