Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-13487-apmail-geronimo-dev-archive=geronimo.apache.org@geronimo.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 34224 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2005 09:19:52 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jul 2005 09:19:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 26700 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2005 09:19:45 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 26667 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2005 09:19:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@geronimo.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@geronimo.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@geronimo.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
List-Id: <dev.geronimo.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 26653 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jul 2005 09:19:45 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 02:19:45 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Received: from [155.208.255.36] (HELO grerelbul01.net.external.hp.com)
 (155.208.255.36)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 02:19:46 -0700
Received: from vistula.poland.hp.com (vistula.poland.hp.com [15.188.0.12])
	by grerelbul01.net.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB2137F27
	for <dev@geronimo.apache.org>; Mon,  4 Jul 2005 11:19:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (jlaskowski1.emea.hpqcorp.net [16.55.101.31]) by
 vistula.poland.hp.com with ESMTP (8.9.3 (PHNE_28760_binary)/8.8.6 SMKit7.02)
 id LAA07553 for <dev@geronimo.apache.org>;
 Mon, 4 Jul 2005 11:19:29 +0200 (METDST)
Message-ID: <42C8FF1E.1040908@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 11:19:26 +0200
From: Jacek Laskowski <jlaskowski@apache.org>
Organization: Apache Geronimo (http://geronimo.apache.org)
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: CMP mapping - cmp-field-name vs field-name
References: <42C86907.8090204@apache.org> <42C8C262.3040805@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <42C8C262.3040805@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Jeremy Boynes wrote:

> Given the discussion on the web changes, I'd ask please don't break 
> existing plans. That should be possible here by defining a choice in the 
> schema between <cmp-field-name> and <field-name> and having the 
> underlying builder code accept either form.

Don't worry ;) I'm just studying the openejb.xml file structure and came 
across the question. I don't want to change anything in the file yet, 
but since the mapping is a manual process it's definitely worth to keep 
it in mind. Reported an enhancement in JIRA - 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-700.

> Jeremy

Jacek