Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 95446 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2005 17:55:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2005 17:55:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 86182 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2005 17:55:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 86144 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2005 17:55:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 86128 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2005 17:55:04 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 10:55:04 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [72.10.34.3] (HELO ss53.shared.server-system.net) (72.10.34.3) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 10:55:07 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (c-24-4-205-190.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.205.190]) (authenticated bits=0) by ss53.shared.server-system.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j61Ht0dc008176 for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 10:55:01 -0700 Message-ID: <42C58374.1090703@toolazydogs.com> Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 10:55:00 -0700 From: "Alan D. Cabrera" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Questions about CORBA References: <42C4FFA2.6080502@apache.org> <42C50AFA.20904@gmail.com> <42C578AE.6000204@toolazydogs.com> <42C57CB7.9010705@dekasoft.com.ua> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 7/1/2005 10:37 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote: > To Rick and Alan, there's an option 4, Implement Our Own ORB. I >don't think we're super-excited to start a project of that magnitude from >scratch (we do tend to favor the whole "incorporate best of breed project" >approach!), but I imagine it would be at least be considered if nothing >else worked out. > > Option 5, a vendor donate their ORB to ASF. Anyone? Anyone? Regards, Alan