Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of dblevins@visi.com designates
 208.42.156.2 as permitted sender)
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 20:58:01 -0700
From: David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [CONSENSUS?] Preparation for M4 -- branch early
Message-ID: <20050705035801.GB18927@django>
References: <20050704212155.GD18287@django> <42C9D2CC.80306@apache.org>
 <20050705012722.GA18701@django> <42C9E48F.30803@apache.org>
 <20050705021534.GA18755@django> <20050705024643.GC18794@django>
 <Pine.LNX.4.58.0507042251580.2190@saturn.opentools.org>
 <42C9FF8A.70008@apache.org>
 <Pine.LNX.4.58.0507042348140.2190@saturn.opentools.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0507042348140.2190@saturn.opentools.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 11:55:11PM -0400, Aaron Mulder wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> > > 	I want to get the key generator changes in for M4.  However, I'm
> > > currently blocked because I can't add the new module to TranQL.  So I'd
> > > like to resolve that before the branch.  Other than that, I'm fine to go
> > > ahead with the 24 hour notice.
> > 
> > I don't think this is a pre-req for M4.
> 
> 	Why not?  The feature has the support of the group.  The code is
> ready, the test pass, the itests pass, the TCK passes.  If you'd like to
> -1 it please provide a technical reason.
> 
> 	Myself, I'd prefer to get it in to M4 because it involves a change
> to the EJB deployment syntax.  I'd like to put it in a stable release
> ASAP.  And the syntax of that plan has changed since M3 already.
> 

Good points.

-David