geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <>
Subject Re: Outstanding tasks for M4
Date Tue, 19 Jul 2005 17:24:46 GMT
what is the proper use of Jira for defects that occur in multiple 
branches/releases?  There are at least 2 issues fixed in head that need 
to be backported


Also, I suggest that anyone changing a dependency version in M4 should 
do the same in head at the same time.  vice versa I'm less concerned 

david jencks

On Jul 19, 2005, at 10:03 AM, David Blevins wrote:

> On Jul 19, 2005, at 7:06 AM, wrote:
>> Can everyone please check that any work they are planning on doing 
>> for the M4 release is listed when you view the open issues for the 
>> 1.0-M4 version, so we don't have any last minute surprises.
> I pulled down the list of outstanding issues for M4:
> GERONIMO-518    Deploying Struts app fails on Logging 
> ClassCastException
> GERONIMO-664    Tomcat need webservices integrated
> GERONIMO-746    Move from commons_discovery SNAPSHOT to formal version
> GERONIMO-741    Move from ActiveIO 1.0 to ActiveIO 1.1
> GERONIMO-740    Move from ActiveMQ 3.1-SNAPSHOT to a formal release
> GERONIMO-755    Move from Scout (JAXR) version 1.0-SNAPSHOT to a 
> formal version
> GERONIMO-756    Move ServiceMix from 1.0-SNAPSHOT to a formal or 
> dated/versioned release for Geronimo M4
> GERONIMO-757    Move from jUDDI SNAPSHOT to formal version
> GERONIMO-745    Move from Axis 1.3-SNAPSHOT to formal version
> GERONIMO-760    Move tmporb SNAPSHOT dependency to a dated version in 
> M4 Geronimo & OpenEJB branches
> GERONIMO-728    Jetty gives misleading NPE on "port in use" condition
> GERONIMO-772    Move OpenEJB from jelly velocity tags SNAPSHOT to 
> version 1.0
> GERONIMO-771    Move from custom cglib build version HEAD-06-06-05 to 
> cglib-nodep-2.1_2.jar
> In that list, these are the only two non-dependency related items:
> GERONIMO-664    Tomcat need webservices integrated
> GERONIMO-728    Jetty gives misleading NPE on "port in use" condition
> Could I humbly submit that GERONIMO-664 is a new feature that could 
> simply be documented as not working for M4?
> We could probably get the dependencies cleared up today and the CTS 
> testing started and (knocking on wood) the release out by the end of 
> the week.
> -David

View raw message