geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From siss...@insession.com
Subject Re: Outstanding tasks for M4
Date Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:07:44 GMT
David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com> wrote on 20/07/2005 03:03:27 AM:

> On Jul 19, 2005, at 7:06 AM, sissonj@insession.com wrote:
> 
> >
> > Can everyone please check that any work they are planning on doing 
> > for the M4 release is listed when you view the open issues for the 
> > 1.0-M4 version, so we don't have any last minute surprises.
> >
> 
> I pulled down the list of outstanding issues for M4:
> 
> GERONIMO-518    Deploying Struts app fails on Logging ClassCastException
> GERONIMO-664    Tomcat need webservices integrated
> GERONIMO-746    Move from commons_discovery SNAPSHOT to formal version
> GERONIMO-741    Move from ActiveIO 1.0 to ActiveIO 1.1
> GERONIMO-740    Move from ActiveMQ 3.1-SNAPSHOT to a formal release
> GERONIMO-755    Move from Scout (JAXR) version 1.0-SNAPSHOT to a 
> formal version
> GERONIMO-756    Move ServiceMix from 1.0-SNAPSHOT to a formal or 
> dated/versioned release for Geronimo M4
> GERONIMO-757    Move from jUDDI SNAPSHOT to formal version
> GERONIMO-745    Move from Axis 1.3-SNAPSHOT to formal version
> GERONIMO-760    Move tmporb SNAPSHOT dependency to a dated version in 
> M4 Geronimo & OpenEJB branches
> GERONIMO-728    Jetty gives misleading NPE on "port in use" condition
> GERONIMO-772    Move OpenEJB from jelly velocity tags SNAPSHOT to 
> version 1.0
> GERONIMO-771    Move from custom cglib build version HEAD-06-06-05 to 
> cglib-nodep-2.1_2.jar
> 
> In that list, these are the only two non-dependency related items:
> GERONIMO-664    Tomcat need webservices integrated
> GERONIMO-728    Jetty gives misleading NPE on "port in use" condition
> 
> Could I humbly submit that GERONIMO-664 is a new feature that could 
> simply be documented as not working for M4?
> 
> We could probably get the dependencies cleared up today and the CTS 
> testing started and (knocking on wood) the release out by the end of 
> the week.
> 
> -David

Should GERONIMO-664 be updated to have M5 as the fixed version, since the 
if it is not working, it is not finished?

I will update GERONIMO-728 to aim for M5, and see if we can get an updated 
Jetty release with it fixed by then, if not M5 then 1.0.

John

Mime
View raw message