geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From siss...@insession.com
Subject Re: Comment in j2ee-server-plan.xml about jetty in M4
Date Thu, 21 Jul 2005 06:48:44 GMT
OK, I'll remove it.

Thanks.

This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential, 
proprietary or non-public information.  This information is intended 
solely for the designated recipient(s).  If an addressing or transmission 
error has misdirected this e-mail, please notify the sender immediately 
and destroy this e-mail.  Any review, dissemination, use or reliance upon 
this information by unintended recipients is prohibited.  Any opinions 
expressed in this e-mail are those of the author personally.

David Jencks <djencks@gluecode.com> wrote on 21/07/2005 04:36:51 PM:

> yes, remove it.  that's very historical :-)
> At one time there was a primitive soap listener in openejb.  Then there 
> was a special port for ws on jetty.  now ws runs through the normal web 
> port, either jetty or tomcat.
> 
> david jencks
> 
> On Jul 20, 2005, at 11:30 PM, sissonj@insession.com wrote:
> 
> > Should the comment below be removed from the file?  If not, can 
someone
> > explain where Jetty is involved here.
> >
> > Should we be able to run M4 with tomcat without any jetty use at all?
> >
> > <!-- HTTP/SOAP Protocol is now run through jetty-->
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > John
> >
> 


Mime
View raw message