On Jul 10, 2005, at 2:58 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
> Then we're pretty sure the binary will be coordinated. The next
> question is whether we should include the TranQL and OpenEJB source
> in our
> source tarball or just the Geronimo source. I guess for official
> builds
> we probably need to restrict it to geronimo source for licensing
> reasons.
> I'm not sure if that would be compelling for unstable builds. It
> would be
> nice to have the whole tree in there together, even though this still
> doesn't make the whole thing "repeatable" (since we still depend on so
> many SNAPSHOTS).
I don't think we want to distribute source from elsewhere.
>
> I don't want to start the shapshot issue on this thread, though, I
> just wonder what others think about building a binary via the
> uberbuild
> and distributing source for OpenEJB and TranQL in the source tarball.
>
Ok - I was going to say :
"Well, given the close relationships we have w/ OpenEJB and TranQL,
couldn't we just ask those projects to do a dated unstable build
distinguishable from a SNAPSHOT?"
But I wont's since you don't want that on this thread.
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org
|