geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@apache.org>
Subject Re: M4 Release Issue - GBeanName Veto
Date Mon, 11 Jul 2005 23:04:44 GMT
Given it's been a while, can someone just re-explain the issue?  I'm  
sure we'll just fix it and move on.

geir

On Jul 11, 2005, at 5:12 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:

> I've reconsidered this:
>
> +1 on canonical name as internal string representation
> +1 on attempting to preserve whatever string is used to construct   
> the gbean name
> +1 on restricting characters in gbean name and assuring that gbean   
> name >> object name conversion always works in a non-surprising   
> manner.
>
> How hard would it be to get the GBeanName to do this?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
> Dain Sundstrom wrote, On 7/11/2005 10:49 AM:
>
>
>> Before we release M4 we need to resolve the standing veto against   
>> geronimo/trunk/modules/kernel/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/gbean/  
>> GBeanName.java
>>
>> Note the +1s below are actually -1s the removal of said feature  
>> from  javax.management.ObjectName, which this class replaced.
>>
>> -dain
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>
>>> From: "Alan D. Cabrera" <adc@toolazydogs.com>
>>> Date: February 23, 2005 11:56:20 AM PST
>>> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: GBeanName [was: svn commit: r154723...]
>>> Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> For the record;
>>>>
>>>> +1 on canonical name as internal string representation
>>>> -1 on attempting to preserve whatever string is used to  
>>>> construct  the gbean name
>>>> +1 on restricting characters in gbean name and assuring that  
>>>> gbean  name >> object name conversion always works in a non- 
>>>> surprising  manner.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org



Mime
View raw message