geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@apache.org>
Subject Re: M4 Release Issue - GBeanName Veto
Date Mon, 11 Jul 2005 23:20:20 GMT

On Jul 11, 2005, at 7:18 PM, David Blevins wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 06:38:39PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 11, 2005, at 4:45 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 09:43:46PM +0200, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Before we release M4 we need to resolve the standing veto against
>>>>> geronimo/trunk/modules/kernel/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/gbean/
>>>>> GBeanName.java
>>>>>
>>>>> Note the +1s below are actually -1s the removal of said feature  
>>>>> from
>>>>> javax.management.ObjectName, which this class replaced.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well, I don't see 0 as the 'I don't know/care' option, which I'm  
>>>> not
>>>> very happy with. I seem to be unconscious of what the change would
>>>> result in. Would you provide more information to let me vote for or
>>>> against it *or* provide the 0 option.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> You can always vote anywhere in the range of +1 through -1,
>>> including fractionally like +0.9 or -0.5.
>>>
>>
>> I think fractions are confusing and I've never really seen them used
>> often.  I tend to think conventional patterns like the following are
>> clearer :
>>
>> +1 : yes
>> +0 : yes, but I'm not helping
>>  0 : no opinion
>> -0 : no, but I'm not going to stand in the way
>> -1 : no
>>
>>
>
> I agree.  Was just pointing out to Jacek that he can vote 0 if he
> wants too -- it's always an option even if not listed.

Agreed.

>
> -David
>
>

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org



Mime
View raw message