geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: xfire jar files needed at runtime?
Date Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:52:00 GMT
I think that is the case for the rev you mention, and I'm fairly sure 
of it for the current m4 branch.  Best way is to try it to find out 
:-).  I'm 99% sure you will run into no problems as long as you don't 
use web services, and 90% sure even if you do use web services.

thanks
david jencks
On Jul 21, 2005, at 11:25 AM, lin sun wrote:

> David,
>
> Thanks so much for your answer.  Correct me if I
> understand incorrectly.... So we will need the two jar
> files to build the files you mentioned below, but we
> don't need the two jar files at runtime.
>
> Lin
>
>
>
> --- David Jencks <djencks@gluecode.com> wrote:
>
>> no, their use has been removed from head.  In the
>> interests of greater
>> stability the files that depend on them, although
>> not actually used,
>> will not be removed from m4.
>>
>> We do hope to eventually create a working xfire ws
>> implementation, but
>> I hope we would do that as separate geronimo modules
>> rather than
>> embedded inside openejb core.
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>> On Jul 21, 2005, at 10:51 AM, lin sun wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I noticed that the latest binary distribution of
>>> geronimo (1.0-169186) contains the following 2
>> xfire
>>> jar files:
>>>
>>>  xfire-20050202.jar
>>>  xfire-java-20050202.jar
>>>
>>> Do we really need them at runtime?  Any info is
>>> appreciated.
>>>
>>> thanks, Lin
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
>> protection around
>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> thanks,
>
> Lin
>
>
> 		
> ____________________________________________________
> Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>
>


Mime
View raw message