geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <>
Subject Re: ToDos for M4
Date Mon, 11 Jul 2005 10:38:22 GMT

On Jul 10, 2005, at 10:02 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:

> On Jul 10, 2005, at 4:42 AM, mos wrote:
>> Just some thoughts:
>> Shouldn't well known and essential bugs be fixed before doing the  
>> branch?
>> This could prevent duplicated work.
>> For example:
> I think that we should update the M4 roadmap to reflect what we  
> really think is needed before we kick this out the door, i.e.  
> branch.  There are things in there that I'm not sure that we'll  
> complete in the timeframe that we want for M4.
> There are also things like 715 that people want to go out for M4.

Well, how about doing a more formal M5 very soon with a clearer roadmap?

>> Bye the way:
>> Would the subprojects like OpenEJB be part of the branch of M4?
>> I assume this because this modules are an essential part of geronimo
>> and have to be closely synchronized with the rest.
> OpenEJB is not a sub-project of Geronimo. However, we should use a  
> specific version of OpenEJB in our M4 branch.


> What I think that what could be done is that we could build a  
> snapshot of OpenEJB and label the version w/ a timestamp.  We would  
> then upload the jar into a maven repo, preferably ibiblio.

I assume "we" == "OpenEJB people at OpenEJB project"?  "we" ==  
"Geronimo project" shouldn't be doing releases on behalf of other  
projects, but I don't think you meant that.


Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437

View raw message