geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <djen...@gluecode.com>
Subject Re: Project Dependencies: TranQL & maybe someday GBean.org
Date Wed, 06 Jul 2005 01:32:03 GMT
While I'm sympathetic to your goal here, the committer requirement is 
unrealistic in general.  I don't think it too likely that any of us 
will become cglib committers in the near future, but it is a stable 
project with plenty of other users.

thanks
david jencks

On Jul 5, 2005, at 6:19 PM, sissonj@insession.com wrote:

> I was just thinking about the issues of external project dependencies 
> in
> general.. Should there be a process for evaluating the introduction of 
> new
> 'critical' dependencies in Geronimo.
>
> I think we should at least ensure that a 'critical' external project 
> meets
> a minimum criteria, for example:
>
> * An operational web site and documentation that describes the 
> dependency
> (more than just a paragraph).
> * Operational mailing lists and mail archives
> * Operational bug tracking system
> * More than one Geronimo committer on the project
>
> Currently some of the projects being discussed in this thread do not 
> meet
> the 'example' criteria above.  Just picture yourself as a new Geronimo
> developer wanting to get involved.  Go to these project websites and 
> try
> looking at the mailing list archives and see how much information you 
> can
> find about the project.
>
> What would be the impact to the Geronimo community if a critical 
> project
> initially met this criterial then stops meeting the 'example' criteria?
>
> Have we identified the risks of depending on 'critical' external 
> projects.
>  I'm not saying we shouldn't rely upon them, but at least think about 
> the
> risks and how they can be minimised.  For example is it safe to rely 
> upon
> these assumptions?:
>
> * that the project host will always be operating
> * that the project host will backup the project source (mistakes can
> happen) and that we will always have access to the source.
> * that mailing list archives for the project kept by the hosting 
> project
> will always be available.
> * that the bug tracking records for the project will always be 
> available
>
> If Geronimo is integrating best of breed external components, then 
> IMHO,
> the project infrastructure and community around those components 
> should be
> well established.
>
> John
>
> This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential,
> proprietary or non-public information.  This information is intended
> solely for the designated recipient(s).  If an addressing or 
> transmission
> error has misdirected this e-mail, please notify the sender immediately
> and destroy this e-mail.  Any review, dissemination, use or reliance 
> upon
> this information by unintended recipients is prohibited.  Any opinions
> expressed in this e-mail are those of the author personally.
>
> Aaron Mulder <ammulder@alumni.princeton.edu> wrote on 06/07/2005 
> 09:08:13
> AM:
>
>>    Changing the subject since we're drifting again.  This is related
>> to another issue that's come up off-list, but we may as well open it 
>> to
> a
>> broader discussion here.
>>
>> On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>>> TranQL is a Codehaus project so it is down to the despots, currently
> me.
>>> The barrier to entry is not high but so far I've not seen anything
>>> except that problematic patch.
>>
>>    Okay.  Well, without getting into specifics, I'm not real
>> comfortable with Geronimo being heavily dependent on a Codehaus 
>> project
>> with precisely one, er, despot.  I feel the same about the GBean.org
>> kernel, which while not currently a part of Geronimo, will likely be a
>> candidate for it (and this of course is one of the issues around it).
>>
>>    Jeremy, would you consider either substantially enlarging the
>> community of despots for TranQL, bringing it to Apache, or merging
>> it into OpenEJB?
>>
>>    Dain, would you consider either substantially enlarging the
>> community of despots for GBean.org, bringing it to Apache, or merging 
>> it
>> into Geronimo (as a branch or sandbox module for the present, I
> presume)?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>    Aaron
>


Mime
View raw message