geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Schmidt <schmidt...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Outstanding tasks for M4
Date Thu, 21 Jul 2005 02:04:55 GMT
sissonj@insession.com wrote:

>David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com> wrote on 20/07/2005 03:03:27 AM:
>
>  
>
>>On Jul 19, 2005, at 7:06 AM, sissonj@insession.com wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Can everyone please check that any work they are planning on doing 
>>>for the M4 release is listed when you view the open issues for the 
>>>1.0-M4 version, so we don't have any last minute surprises.
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>I pulled down the list of outstanding issues for M4:
>>
>>GERONIMO-518    Deploying Struts app fails on Logging ClassCastException
>>GERONIMO-664    Tomcat need webservices integrated
>>GERONIMO-746    Move from commons_discovery SNAPSHOT to formal version
>>GERONIMO-741    Move from ActiveIO 1.0 to ActiveIO 1.1
>>GERONIMO-740    Move from ActiveMQ 3.1-SNAPSHOT to a formal release
>>GERONIMO-755    Move from Scout (JAXR) version 1.0-SNAPSHOT to a 
>>formal version
>>GERONIMO-756    Move ServiceMix from 1.0-SNAPSHOT to a formal or 
>>dated/versioned release for Geronimo M4
>>GERONIMO-757    Move from jUDDI SNAPSHOT to formal version
>>GERONIMO-745    Move from Axis 1.3-SNAPSHOT to formal version
>>GERONIMO-760    Move tmporb SNAPSHOT dependency to a dated version in 
>>M4 Geronimo & OpenEJB branches
>>GERONIMO-728    Jetty gives misleading NPE on "port in use" condition
>>GERONIMO-772    Move OpenEJB from jelly velocity tags SNAPSHOT to 
>>version 1.0
>>GERONIMO-771    Move from custom cglib build version HEAD-06-06-05 to 
>>cglib-nodep-2.1_2.jar
>>
>>In that list, these are the only two non-dependency related items:
>>GERONIMO-664    Tomcat need webservices integrated
>>GERONIMO-728    Jetty gives misleading NPE on "port in use" condition
>>
>>Could I humbly submit that GERONIMO-664 is a new feature that could 
>>simply be documented as not working for M4?
>>
>>We could probably get the dependencies cleared up today and the CTS 
>>testing started and (knocking on wood) the release out by the end of 
>>the week.
>>
>>-David
>>    
>>
>
>Should GERONIMO-664 be updated to have M5 as the fixed version, since the 
>if it is not working, it is not finished?
>
>I will update GERONIMO-728 to aim for M5, and see if we can get an updated 
>Jetty release with it fixed by then, if not M5 then 1.0.
>
>John
>
>  
>
Can someone please have a look into GERONIMO-785 which I find really 
annoying and it destroys the new server startup screen :-). I think 
users won't understand why this error happens... Would be nice to have 
this fixed in M4.

Stefan

 


Mime
View raw message