geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Genender <>
Subject Re: Outstanding tasks for M4
Date Tue, 19 Jul 2005 18:18:36 GMT
GERONIMO-763 too.


David Jencks wrote:
> what is the proper use of Jira for defects that occur in multiple 
> branches/releases?  There are at least 2 issues fixed in head that need 
> to be backported
> Also, I suggest that anyone changing a dependency version in M4 should 
> do the same in head at the same time.  vice versa I'm less concerned about
> thanks
> david jencks
> On Jul 19, 2005, at 10:03 AM, David Blevins wrote:
>> On Jul 19, 2005, at 7:06 AM, wrote:
>>> Can everyone please check that any work they are planning on doing 
>>> for the M4 release is listed when you view the open issues for the 
>>> 1.0-M4 version, so we don't have any last minute surprises.
>> I pulled down the list of outstanding issues for M4:
>> GERONIMO-518    Deploying Struts app fails on Logging ClassCastException
>> GERONIMO-664    Tomcat need webservices integrated
>> GERONIMO-746    Move from commons_discovery SNAPSHOT to formal version
>> GERONIMO-741    Move from ActiveIO 1.0 to ActiveIO 1.1
>> GERONIMO-740    Move from ActiveMQ 3.1-SNAPSHOT to a formal release
>> GERONIMO-755    Move from Scout (JAXR) version 1.0-SNAPSHOT to a 
>> formal version
>> GERONIMO-756    Move ServiceMix from 1.0-SNAPSHOT to a formal or 
>> dated/versioned release for Geronimo M4
>> GERONIMO-757    Move from jUDDI SNAPSHOT to formal version
>> GERONIMO-745    Move from Axis 1.3-SNAPSHOT to formal version
>> GERONIMO-760    Move tmporb SNAPSHOT dependency to a dated version in 
>> M4 Geronimo & OpenEJB branches
>> GERONIMO-728    Jetty gives misleading NPE on "port in use" condition
>> GERONIMO-772    Move OpenEJB from jelly velocity tags SNAPSHOT to 
>> version 1.0
>> GERONIMO-771    Move from custom cglib build version HEAD-06-06-05 to 
>> cglib-nodep-2.1_2.jar
>> In that list, these are the only two non-dependency related items:
>> GERONIMO-664    Tomcat need webservices integrated
>> GERONIMO-728    Jetty gives misleading NPE on "port in use" condition
>> Could I humbly submit that GERONIMO-664 is a new feature that could 
>> simply be documented as not working for M4?
>> We could probably get the dependencies cleared up today and the CTS 
>> testing started and (knocking on wood) the release out by the end of 
>> the week.
>> -David

View raw message