geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <l...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject Re: Questions on Geronimo's var directory and the config-store directory
Date Thu, 14 Jul 2005 16:26:49 GMT
Sounds like a neat idea.


Regards,
Alan

On 7/11/2005 6:22 AM, sissonj@insession.com wrote:

>Is this statement correct.. The "var" directory intended for holding data 
>specific to a particular Geronimo instance and not intended to be shared 
>by multiple instances of geronimo?
>
>If I wanted to run two geronimo instances, sharing the same installation 
>directory (e.g. so geronimo\lib and geronimo\repository is shared), each 
>of the two instances of geronimo would need to be started with a unique 
>geronimo.base.dir property value ?
>
>Currently Geronimo's "config-store" directory is a child of the Geronimo 
>installation directory rather than a child of the"var" directory (which is 
>relative to geronimo.base.dir).  What is the reason for config-store not 
>being under the var directory?  Is it because it is just a file 
>implementation of a config store and could change in the future to some 
>other storage implementation?
>
>If the config-store is being shared by multiple instances of Geronimo 
>couldn't that pose a problem when two instances using the same 
>configuration are updated when a server shuts down?
>
>Does anyone have thoughts on how deployment and loading of configurations 
>would work in the future when Geronimo supports clustering and how it 
>would work with a config store? 
>
>Thanks,
>
>John
>
>This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential, 
>proprietary or non-public information.  This information is intended 
>solely for the designated recipient(s).  If an addressing or transmission 
>error has misdirected this e-mail, please notify the sender immediately 
>and destroy this e-mail.  Any review, dissemination, use or reliance upon 
>this information by unintended recipients is prohibited.  Any opinions 
>expressed in this e-mail are those of the author personally.
>  
>



Mime
View raw message